Numerical Study on Effect of Ventilation on Fire Characteristics of Lithium-Ion Battery in Energy Storage Cabin
Batteries (MDPI AG) · Wei Lin, Lingcheng Zeng et al.
Using FDS, this study models single-cell thermal runaway in a roughly 100 kWh commercial storage cabinet of 280 Ah LFP cells and compares a closed cabinet with one that has an open top for temperature, CO and H2 fields.
CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution
On this page
Overview
The study asks how much a designed venting path reduces heat and gas build-up in a storage cabinet during thermal runaway. A Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) model of a 1450.7 × 1100 × 1923 mm cabinet with five vertically stacked packs was built, with heat-release and gas-composition inputs from earlier experiments. Runaway was triggered at a critical cell temperature of 180 °C, and a 50 mm grid was chosen after a 100/50/25 mm grid-independence study. A fully closed cabinet and one with an open top were compared over a 100 s window.
In the closed cabinet, local peak temperature exceeded 700 °C and CO and H2 reached around 1000 ppm within 60 s after runaway onset, still rising at the end of the window. H2 rose quickly and formed a growing flammable layer under the roof. The explosion concentration limit of LFP vent gas is cited as 4-15% depending on SOC, with H2 and CO the main contributors, and LFP vent gas has been ignited below the theoretical LEL in confined, non-uniform mixtures.
In the open-top cabinet, an unobstructed buoyancy-driven venting channel formed, and peak temperature and peak CO and H2 concentrations at side monitoring points fell by more than 80% compared with the closed cabinet. Commercial and industrial storage cabinets typically hold 100-215 kWh each.
Limits: the study is simulation-only, battery blocks are homogenised and only a single-cell runaway is modelled; propagation, explosion and vent or door opening details in a real cabinet are not tested. It is useful mainly to show the order-of-magnitude effect of designed venting.
Key points
- Commercial and industrial storage cabinets typically hold 100-215 kWh each; the modelled cabinet is 1450.7 × 1100 × 1923 mm with five vertically stacked packs.
- The explosion concentration limit of LFP vent gas is cited as 4-15% depending on SOC, with H2 and CO the main contributors; ignition below the theoretical LEL has been reported in confined, non-uniform mixtures.
- Runaway was triggered at a critical cell temperature of 180 °C; a 50 mm FDS grid was chosen after a 100/50/25 mm grid-independence study.
- In the fully closed cabinet, local peak temperature exceeded 700 °C and CO and H2 reached around 1000 ppm within 60 s after runaway onset, still rising at the end of the 100 s window.
- H2 rose quickly and formed a growing flammable layer under the roof of the closed cabinet.
- With an open top, peak temperature and peak CO and H2 concentrations at side monitoring points fell by more than 80% compared with the closed cabinet.
Using it in design
- Define a designed, buoyancy-driven vent or relief path at the top of a storage cabinet; in a closed cabinet H2 forms a flammable layer under the roof, so control gas and heat build-up.
- Consider placing gas detectors near the cabinet ceiling, where H2 accumulates, and link detection alarms with ventilation and explosion-protection logic.
- Knowing the homogenised-block, single-cell assumption of this study, use the results as an order-of-magnitude effect and ask for testing and explosion-relief analysis for the real cabinet.
Monthly newsletter · free
Keep your reading list current
Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.
SoSo CAD
Bring standards pre-checks into your project
Review model-based TS EN 50600 and Tier pre-checks, missing inputs and items requiring engineering review in SoSo CAD.
Request a demo
Who should read it
Engineers designing ventilation and explosion protection for commercial and industrial battery cabinets and BESS containers.
Document contents
- 1. Introduction
- 2. Model Description (2.1 Physical Model and Locations of Detectors, 2.2 Governing Equations, 2.3 Boundary Conditions, 2.4 Grid Analysis)
- 3. Results and Analysis (3.1 Fire Spread Behavior in Closed Cabin: fire propagation characteristics, gas dispersion analysis; 3.2 Fire Spread Behavior in Cabin Without Top Cover)
- 4. Conclusions
Related standards
- NFPA 855
- NFPA 68
- NFPA 69
- UL 9540A
Read the document
energy-storage-cabin-ventilation-fire-2026.pdf
CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution
The document is provided unaltered because its licence permits redistribution.
Publication details
- Authors
- Wei Lin; Lingcheng Zeng; Junyu Liu; Zhiying Ding
- Publisher
- Batteries (MDPI AG)
- Year
- 2026
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 250
- Document language
- English
- Source type
- Scientific
- Access
- Open licence — downloadable
- Licence
- CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution
- Licence evidence
- www.mdpi.com
Original licence note
PDF p.1 states the article is distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Citation
Wei Lin; Lingcheng Zeng; Junyu Liu; Zhiying Ding (2026). Numerical Study on Effect of Ventilation on Fire Characteristics of Lithium-Ion Battery in Energy Storage Cabin. Batteries (MDPI AG). 12(7), 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/batteries12070250
Events on this subject
Browse the events calendarAll content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.