Research paperPDF2020

A Review of Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Suppression

Energies (MDPI AG) · Mohammadmahdi Ghiji, Vasily Novozhilov et al.

This review covers lithium-ion cell construction, the abuse modes that trigger thermal runaway, safety measures at cell, module, pack and compartment level, and extinguishing agents; its central argument is that many agents can knock down flames but only sustained cooling stops runaway.

CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution

On this page

Overview

The review asks how the fire risk of Li-ion batteries (LiBs) can be reduced and which agent is actually effective against these fires. The method is a literature survey: cathode, anode, separator and electrolyte components, battery systems, thermal runaway and fire, safety at cell, module/pack and compartment level, fire detection and extinguishing agents (water, foam, powder, CO2, halon-based) and LiB suppression studies are covered in turn, followed by detail on water-mist characterisation, nozzle characteristics and extinguishing mechanisms.

In thermal abuse, internal temperatures of 90-120 °C cause exothermic SEI decomposition, and above 200 °C the hydrocarbon electrolyte can decompose and release heat. Heat detectors are reported as the slowest way to detect LiB fires and are not recommended; combined smoke-heat detectors are reported as the fastest and are recommended. LiB fires straddle classes A, B and E, and the authors stress that cooling cells in a large pack to stop propagation matters more than extinguishing a single cell's flames.

On agents: halon-based agents can extinguish a LiB fire but cannot stop the internal temperature rise or prevent re-ignition. HFC-227ea outperformed CO2 and powder in cited tests, and Novec 1230 was also found effective. In DNV-GL tests, F500, FireIce, PyroCool foam, Stat-X aerosol and sprinklers all extinguished the fires, but the water-based systems cooled better over time. When water mist vaporises its volume grows by more than three orders of magnitude, diluting oxygen and fuel vapour, and a cited study found mist cut radiant heat flux to enclosure walls by 70%.

The conclusion is that water mist with additives and surfactants, or combined with a gaseous agent, is the most promising extinguishing and cooling method for LiBs. Limits: as a review it has no new measurements, and the cited tests used different cell types, scales and set-ups and cannot be compared directly.

Key points

  1. Thermal abuse: internal temperatures of 90-120 °C cause exothermic SEI decomposition, and above 200 °C the hydrocarbon electrolyte can decompose and release heat.
  2. Heat detectors are reported as the slowest way to detect LiB fires and are not recommended; combined smoke-heat detectors are reported as the fastest and are recommended.
  3. LiB fires straddle classes A, B and E; cooling cells in a large pack to stop propagation matters more than extinguishing a single cell's flames.
  4. Halon-based agents can extinguish a LiB fire but cannot stop the internal temperature rise or prevent re-ignition; HFC-227ea outperformed CO2 and powder in cited tests and Novec 1230 was also effective.
  5. In DNV-GL tests, F500, FireIce, PyroCool foam, Stat-X aerosol and sprinklers all extinguished the fires, but the water-based systems cooled better over time.
  6. When water mist vaporises, its volume grows by more than three orders of magnitude, diluting oxygen and fuel vapour; a cited study found mist cut radiant heat flux to enclosure walls by 70%.
  7. The authors conclude that water mist with additives and surfactants, or combined with a gaseous agent, is the most promising extinguishing and cooling method for LiBs.

Using it in design

  • In Li-ion UPS and BESS areas, set up detection with combined smoke-heat detectors; do not rely on heat detectors alone.
  • Define the suppression design goal as cooling neighbouring cells (stopping propagation and re-ignition) as well as knocking down flames; do not treat a gaseous agent alone as sufficient.
  • Evaluate water mist, or water mist plus a gaseous agent, with its nozzle and droplet-size characteristics among the suppression alternatives for BESS and battery rooms.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Bring standards pre-checks into your project

Review model-based TS EN 50600 and Tier pre-checks, missing inputs and items requiring engineering review in SoSo CAD.

Request a demo
Selected rule packs and findings in the SoSo CAD standards panel

Who should read it

Fire-safety engineers designing fire detection and suppression for Li-ion battery rooms, UPS and BESS.

Document contents

  1. 1. Introduction
  2. 2. Lithium-Ion Battery Components (cathode, anode, separator, electrolyte)
  3. 3. Lithium-Ion Battery Systems
  4. 4. Thermal Runaway and Fire
  5. 5. Fire Protection Techniques (safety at cell, module and pack, and compartment level)
  6. 6. Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Detection and Suppression (types of extinguishants: water, foam, powder, CO2, halon-based; LiB suppression studies; water mist characterisation: droplet size distribution, spray cone angle, velocity, mass flow rate, momentum; nozzle characteristics; mechanisms of extinguishment; water mist system characteristics)
  7. 7. Summary and Outlook

Related standards

  • NFPA 855
  • NFPA 750
  • NFPA 2001
  • UL 9540A

Read the document

li-ion-battery-fire-suppression-review-2020.pdf

PDF · 2.1 MB · English

CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution

The document is provided unaltered because its licence permits redistribution.

Publication details

Authors
Mohammadmahdi Ghiji; Vasily Novozhilov; Khalid Moinuddin; Paul Joseph; Ian Burch; Brigitta Suendermann; Grant Gamble
Publisher
Energies (MDPI AG)
Year
2020
Volume
13
Issue
19
Pages
5117
Document language
English
Source type
Scientific
Access
Open licence — downloadable
Licence
CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution
Licence evidence
www.mdpi.com
Original licence note

PDF p.30 states the article is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Citation

Mohammadmahdi Ghiji; Vasily Novozhilov; Khalid Moinuddin; Paul Joseph; Ian Burch; Brigitta Suendermann; Grant Gamble (2020). A Review of Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Suppression. Energies (MDPI AG). 13(19), 5117. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13195117

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.