Technical guideFree to read2025

Energy Storage Is a Core Power Strategy for Next-Generation Data Centers

Burns & McDonnell · Justin Gruetzner, Joshua Tucker

A Burns & McDonnell white paper on battery energy storage systems (BESS) as a campus-scale power asset for hyperscale and AI data centres.

On this page

Overview

This 2025 white paper by Justin Gruetzner and Joshua Tucker was published by Burns & McDonnell. It treats battery energy storage systems as a campus-scale power asset for hyperscale and AI data centres. It sets out use cases from interconnection support and load smoothing to spinning reserve, black start and campus-level UPS, and explains which are sized on MW and which on MWh.

On sizing, most commercial BESS offer 2-4 h duration, and data centres usually prioritise MW capacity over duration. Load smoothing is sized on MW, while spinning reserve and backup are sized on MWh from ramp rates, start times and required ride-through. Degradation is handled by initial overbuild plus augmentation, often in years 3-5, and 20-25 year performance guarantees are common.

On chemistry, LFP is preferred over NMC because thermal runaway starts at a higher temperature and propagation risk is lower. On electrical architecture, current data centre BESS connect AC at medium voltage, typically 34.5 kV, while 800 V DC buses are emerging. Alternatives such as sodium, flow batteries and flywheels are treated as complementary rather than near-term replacements. These architectural choices directly affect site layout and the connection point.

The primary codes are NFPA 855, UL 9540 and the UL 9540A large-scale fire tests, which drive layout spacing; NFPA 72 is used for detection. NFPA 75 is also among the related standards. The document is a consultancy white paper, so it needs vendor- and project-specific verification, and its figures are given under particular assumptions. Even so, the MW versus MWh distinction and the code requirements give teams bringing BESS into the design a practical framework.

Key points

  1. Most commercial BESS offer 2-4 h duration; data centres usually prioritise MW capacity over duration.
  2. Load smoothing is sized on MW; spinning reserve and backup on MWh, from ramp rates, start times and required ride-through.
  3. Degradation is handled by initial overbuild plus augmentation, often in years 3-5; 20-25 year performance guarantees are common.
  4. LFP is preferred over NMC because thermal runaway starts at a higher temperature and propagation risk is lower.
  5. Current data centre BESS connect AC at medium voltage, typically 34.5 kV; 800 V DC buses are emerging.
  6. Primary codes: NFPA 855, UL 9540 and UL 9540A large-scale fire tests (which drive layout spacing); NFPA 72 for detection.
  7. Sodium, flow batteries and flywheels are treated as complementary, not near-term replacements.
  8. Use cases include interconnection support, load smoothing, spinning reserve, black start and campus-level UPS.

Using it in design

  • Add a BESS catalogue type with chemistry, MW, MWh, connection voltage and UL 9540A test reference.
  • Define separate sizing rules for MW-driven and MWh-driven use cases.
  • Apply NFPA 855 spacing and exposure checks in site layout.
  • Warn when NMC is chosen near occupied buildings.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Review your power design in SoSo CAD

Inspect supply paths, equipment loads and UPS failure scenarios in one model.

Request a demo
Single-line diagram in the SoSo CAD power and capacity workspace

Who should read it

Electrical engineers, energy consultants and fire-safety specialists planning BESS for hyperscale and AI data centres.

Related standards

  • NFPA 855
  • UL 9540
  • UL 9540A
  • NFPA 72
  • NFPA 75

Publication details

Authors
Justin Gruetzner; Joshua Tucker
Publisher
Burns & McDonnell
Year
2025
Document number
10791403663
Document language
English
Source type
Expert / community
Access
Free to read
Licence
Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document

Citation

Justin Gruetzner; Joshua Tucker (2025). Energy Storage Is a Core Power Strategy for Next-Generation Data Centers. Burns & McDonnell. 10791403663. https://info.burnsmcd.com/white-paper/energy-storage-is-a-core-power-strategy-for-next-generation-data-centers

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.