White paperFree to read2012

AC Versus DC Power Distribution: Issues to Consider When Comparing Options for Improving Data Center Energy Efficiency

Eaton · Robert W. Johnson

Eaton WP153001 compares end-to-end power-chain efficiency, from source to 12 VDC inside the server, for North American AC architectures and 380 VDC distribution, and concludes that AC with a high-efficiency UPS matches or beats DC.

On this page

Overview

The paper walks from a legacy 480 V/208 V chain through newer components, high-efficiency UPS modes and PDU elimination with 480/277 V or 400/230 V distribution, and compares these with narrow- and wide-range DC buses. Chain efficiencies: legacy AC 61%; newer components 83%; high-efficiency UPS mode 87.5%; no PDU with 480/277 V or 400/230 V 89%; DC narrow-range 86%; DC wide-range 84%.

Practical constraints are listed too. Few server PSUs accept 277 V input, which makes 480/277 V impractical; 400/230 V is the realistic option. High-efficiency UPSs can achieve mode transfer times of 0-4 ms. Redundant A/B feeds halve the load per source and lower the converters' operating efficiency.

DC issues include extra poles needed for breaking above 250 VDC, limited discrimination, arc-fault fire risk, undefined arc-flash energy, and PSU holdup that must exceed fault clearing time.

The paper also proposes auto-zigzag transformers to derive 415/240 V from 480 V delta, with about 1.5% impedance against about 5.75% for a typical isolation transformer.

Key points

  1. Chain efficiency: legacy AC 61%; newer components 83%; high-efficiency UPS mode 87.5%; no PDU with 480/277 V or 400/230 V 89%; DC narrow-range 86%; DC wide-range 84%.
  2. High-efficiency UPSs can achieve mode transfer times of 0-4 ms.
  3. Few server PSUs accept 277 V, making 480/277 V impractical; 400/230 V is the realistic option.
  4. Redundant A/B feeds halve load per source and lower the converters' operating efficiency.
  5. DC issues: extra poles above 250 VDC, limited discrimination, arc-fault fire risk, undefined arc-flash energy, PSU holdup that must exceed fault clearing time.
  6. An auto-zigzag transformer for 480 V delta to 415/240 V has about 1.5% impedance versus about 5.75% for a typical isolation transformer.

Using it in design

  • Provide a power-chain efficiency calculator by stage (transformer, UPS mode, PDU, PSU) including the effect of the A/B load split.
  • Offer voltage options per region (208/120, 415/240, 400/230, 480/277, 380 VDC) with a PSU compatibility check.
  • For DC buses above 250 V require DC-rated multi-pole protection and a holdup-versus-clearing-time check.
  • Flag 277 V distribution when the IT PSUs are not rated for it.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Review your power design in SoSo CAD

Inspect supply paths, equipment loads and UPS failure scenarios in one model.

Request a demo
Single-line diagram in the SoSo CAD power and capacity workspace

Who should read it

Designers comparing AC and DC distribution on energy efficiency.

Related standards

  • NEC Article 450
  • NEC 210.9
  • NEC 250.36
  • ETSI EN 300 132-3

Publication details

Authors
Robert W. Johnson
Publisher
Eaton
Year
2012
Document number
WP153001EN
Document language
English
Source type
Manufacturer
Access
Free to read
Licence
Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document

Citation

Robert W. Johnson (2012). AC Versus DC Power Distribution: Issues to Consider When Comparing Options for Improving Data Center Energy Efficiency. Eaton. WP153001EN. https://web.archive.org/web/20240707022753/https://www.eaton.com/content/dam/eaton/markets/data-center/AC-Versus-DC-Power-Distribution.pdf

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.