Reference Design #505: Eaton 1 GW Power Architecture Meets Trane Thermal Management
Eaton / Trane · Eaton, Trane
A joint Eaton-Trane paper describing a gigawatt-scale AI campus built from roughly 100 MW compute blocks, with medium-voltage distribution, 800 V DC rack power and very large CDU capacities.
On this page
Overview
The paper opens with the rack-power trajectory: GB200 NVL72 about 120 kW, GB300 about 140 kW, Vera Rubin NVL72 190-230 kW, Rubin Ultra NVL576 about 600 kW and a Kyber-era SuperPOD about 5 MW. A 100 MW hall of GB200 NVL72 racks means about 830 racks at roughly 120 kW each. Cooling grows with it: CDU capacity rose about 100x in five years, from ~100 kW in 2018 to 1-2 MW in 2025, with 5-10 MW modules next.
Mechanical load is now its own electrical problem. A 100 MW compute block can impose about 20 MW of motor load, with pumps up to 1,500 HP. Each cooling block holds 10 chillers of about 3,000 tons (10-11 MW thermal) and about 20 large pumps. Feeding these motors at 4.16 kV is about current: a 1,500 HP pump draws 1,420 A at 480 V but 164 A at 4.16 kV. CDU pods are treated as UPS-backed critical loads.
On the rack side the paper argues for 800 V DC. Its table shows near-equal currents at 480 V AC and 800 V DC: 152 A versus 150 A at 120 kW, 1,267 A versus 1,250 A at 1 MW, 12,668 A versus 12,500 A at 10 MW. The real gain is conductor count: two-wire DC is claimed to cut copper weight by up to 34% and raise efficiency by 3-5%. This is a joint marketing-style reference design by two manufacturers, so the 3-5% efficiency and 34% copper figures should be read as claims without independent verification. Still, architecture decisions such as MV motor feeds and putting CDUs on UPS give a sound framework for calculations on very large AI campuses.
Key points
- Rack power: GB200 NVL72 ~120 kW, GB300 ~140 kW, Vera Rubin NVL72 190-230 kW, Rubin Ultra NVL576 ~600 kW; Kyber-era SuperPOD ~5 MW
- Current at 480 V AC vs 800 V DC: 120 kW 152 A vs 150 A; 1 MW 1,267 A vs 1,250 A; 10 MW 12,668 A vs 12,500 A
- 800 V DC claimed to raise efficiency 3-5% and cut copper weight up to 34% (2-wire vs 3-phase)
- CDU capacity grew ~100x in five years: ~100 kW (2018) to 1-2 MW (2025) to 5-10 MW modules
- A 100 MW compute block can impose ~20 MW of motor load, pumps up to 1,500 HP
- 1,500 HP pump: 1,420 A at 480 V vs 164 A at 4.16 kV
- Each 100 MW cooling block: 10 chillers of ~3,000 tons (10-11 MW thermal each) plus ~20 large pumps
- 100 MW hall of GB200 NVL72 racks needs ~830 racks at ~120 kW
- CDU pods placed on UPS as critical loads
Using it in design
- Voltage-selection rule: motors above about 200 kW (large chillers and pumps) default to MV (4.16/6.6/11 kV) feeders; compute I = P/(sqrt(3) x V x PF) to show cable savings.
- For liquid-cooled AI blocks default the mechanical load ratio to motor load of about 20% of IT.
- Always put CDUs on UPS.
- Offer 800 V DC rack power as an extra option flagged as emerging.
Monthly newsletter · free
Keep your reading list current
Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.
SoSo CAD
Review your power design in SoSo CAD
Inspect supply paths, equipment loads and UPS failure scenarios in one model.
Request a demo
Who should read it
Designers and investors defining power and cooling architecture for AI campuses of hundreds of MW.
Related standards
- IEEE 1584
- NEC Article 708/645
- OCP Open Rack / 800 VDC
- ASHRAE TC9.9 Liquid Cooling Guidelines
Publication details
- Authors
- Eaton; Trane
- Publisher
- Eaton / Trane
- Year
- 2025
- Document number
- Reference Design #505
- Document language
- English
- Source type
- Manufacturer
- Access
- Free to read
- Licence
- Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document
Citation
Eaton; Trane (2025). Reference Design #505: Eaton 1 GW Power Architecture Meets Trane Thermal Management. Eaton / Trane. Reference Design #505. https://www.trane.com/content/dam/trane-commercial/north-america/en/document/reference/trane-referencedesign-eaton.pdf
Events on this subject
Browse the events calendarAll content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.