Technical guidePDF2025

Assessment of the energy performance and sustainability of data centres in EU - First technical report (July 2025)

European Commission, DG Energy · Dennis Heatubun, Ionut Dragan et al.

The first technical report of a study for European Commission DG ENER, analysing data from the first reporting period of the EU data centre reporting scheme under the Energy Efficiency Directive and Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1364. It supplies real European benchmark values for PUE, WUE, ERF and REF.

CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution

On this page

Overview

The report is the first deliverable of the study supporting Article 12(5) of Directive 2023/1791, prepared for the Commission by EY, AIT and Borderstep. It covers three tasks: the quality and completeness of reported data, the energy efficiency and sustainability of European data centres, and the user experience of the reporting scheme. The analysis uses first-period data as of June 20, 2025; results are preliminary and the document does not reflect the Commission's official position.

Reporting is mandatory for sites with installed IT capacity above 500 kW, and above 300 kW in Germany. In the first period about 36% of eligible EU data centres, 770 facilities, reported; six Member States have no data and five have fewer than three reporting sites. Around 80% of the reported data were judged accurate and reliable. Breakdowns by Member State, type and size are suppressed where fewer than three sites report, and aggregate metrics are weighted by total energy consumption.

In the PUE analysis of 681 sites, energy-weighted averages fall markedly with size: 1.63 for 100-500 kW, 1.64 for 500-1000 kW, 1.55 for 1-2 MW, 1.47 for 2-10 MW and 1.21 above 10 MW. The report attributes this to larger sites being younger, professionally managed and able to exploit economies of scale. Co-hosting and enterprise sites outperform colocation, where operators cannot control IT utilisation and size infrastructure for the most demanding customer. As a rule of thumb PUE below 1.2 is excellent, 1.2-1.5 good and above 1.5 shows room for improvement.

WUE is total water input divided by IT energy; only 458 sites supplied usable water data, with energy-weighted averages from 0.193 m3/MWh at 100-500 kW to 0.704 above 10 MW. Indirect water use is excluded (only EN 50600-4-9 categories 1 and 2). ERF data are very limited: in the reported data about 1.9% of heat is reused, or 23.5% when counting only sites that reuse heat. The EU weighted average REF is 0.87; about two thirds of renewable supply comes from guarantees of origin, under one third from green PPAs and below 1% from on-site generation.

The report recommends improving the scheme: review indicators not directly relevant, differentiate requirements for colocation, enterprise and co-hosting sites, harmonise rules across Member States, document each KPI clearly, add automated plausibility checks, ease navigation and allow import/export in formats such as Excel. For designers the most useful content is the real European PUE and WUE spread and the interplay among PUE, WUE, ERF and REF: improving PUE with water-intensive cooling can worsen WUE. The report openly acknowledges data quality problems.

Key points

  1. EU reporting is mandatory above 500 kW installed IT capacity (Germany: above 300 kW); 770 data centres, about 36% of the EU estimate, reported in the first period.
  2. Energy-weighted average PUE by size: 1.63 (100-500 kW), 1.64 (500-1000 kW), 1.55 (1-2 MW), 1.47 (2-10 MW), 1.21 (above 10 MW), n=681.
  3. Rule of thumb cited: PUE below 1.2 excellent, 1.2-1.5 good, above 1.5 room for improvement.
  4. Colocation sites show higher average PUE than co-hosting and enterprise sites.
  5. Climate Neutral Data Centre Pact targets: PUE 1.3 (1.4 in warm climates) for new sites by 2025 and existing sites by 2030, and WUE 0.4 l/kWh by 2040.
  6. Germany's 2023 Energy Efficiency Act: sites starting from July 2026 need PUE <= 1.3 and ERF 10%, with ERF 15% and 20% for July 2027 and 2028 starts; existing sites need PUE <= 1.5 by July 2027 and <= 1.3 by July 2030.
  7. WUE is total water input divided by IT energy; 458 sites reported usable data and size-class averages run from 0.193 to 0.704 m3/MWh.
  8. First-period EU27 averages per reporting site: installed IT power 17,075 kW (median 1,287 kW), computer room area 3,670 m2, waste heat temperature 24 °C.
  9. All reporting EU sites together have 3,738.86 MW installed IT power, 14,088 GWh energy use and 6,223,391 m3 water consumption.
  10. EU weighted average REF is 0.87; about two thirds of renewable supply comes from guarantees of origin and under 1% from on-site generation. ERF data are limited.

Using it in design

  • Compare your design PUE target with the real EU spread: 1.21 on average above 10 MW, 1.55 at 1-2 MW; set a realistic bound for your facility size.
  • Read targets together: Germany's EnEfG and the Climate Neutral Data Centre Pact set PUE 1.3 for new sites, while ERF targets depend on the presence of a heat offtaker.
  • Assess PUE and WUE together when choosing cooling technology; the report stresses that water-intensive cooling can worsen WUE and that low PUE does not guarantee high REF.
  • When planning heat reuse, confirm local heat demand and climate early; the report notes large sites struggle to find local offtakers able to take their heat continuously.
  • In colocation design, remember that sizing infrastructure for the most demanding customer raises PUE; consider modular zones with different temperature and redundancy levels.
  • For sites subject to reporting, design separate metering for IT and total energy, water input, renewable energy and waste heat from the start.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Compare the cost of design decisions

Evaluate equipment costs, energy expenses and total cost of ownership (TCO) using your inputs and assumptions in SoSo CAD.

Request a demo
CAPEX and TCO estimates in the SoSo CAD cost workspace

Who should read it

Engineers who design or operate data centres in the EU, sustainability and compliance teams, and policy specialists assessing the reporting scheme.

Document contents

  1. Introduction
  2. Methodologies
  3. Study Developments and Results
  4. Task 1.1 - Data quality and completeness assessment
  5. Data completeness assessment
  6. Data quality assessment
  7. Task 1.2 - Energy efficiency and sustainability of European data centres
  8. Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE)
  9. Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE)
  10. Energy Reuse Factor (ERF)
  11. Renewable Energy Factor (REF)
  12. Task 1.3 - Reporting scheme user experience and data management assessment
  13. Conclusion
  14. Recommendations to improve the reporting scheme
  15. Annex 1 - Data quality assessment and valid data points per KPI
  16. Annex 2 - Surveys and interviews
  17. Annexes 3 and 4 - Union and Member State level results according to Annex IV of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2024/1364

Read the document

eu-dc-energy-performance-assessment-2025.pdf

PDF · 1.8 MB · English

CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution

The document is provided unaltered because its licence permits redistribution.

Publication details

Authors
Dennis Heatubun; Ionut Dragan; Marco Bolchi; Patricia Lopes Bautista; Simon Hinterholzer; Ralph Hintemann; Nicolas Marx; Patrik Furda
Publisher
European Commission, DG Energy
Year
2025
Document language
English
Source type
Government / public
Access
Open licence — downloadable
Licence
CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution
Licence evidence
doi.org
Original licence note

Document reuse notice: Commission reuse policy (Decision 2011/833/EU), licensed CC BY 4.0; attribution required; third-party elements excluded.

Citation

Dennis Heatubun; Ionut Dragan; Marco Bolchi; Patricia Lopes Bautista; Simon Hinterholzer; Ralph Hintemann; Nicolas Marx; Patrik Furda (2025). Assessment of the energy performance and sustainability of data centres in EU - First technical report (July 2025). European Commission, DG Energy. https://doi.org/10.2833/3168794

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.