Technical guideFree to read2025

Immersion Server Demonstrated Reliability at Datacenter Scale Deployment (OCP EMEA Summit 2025)

Open Compute Project Foundation · Austin Hipes

A field report presented at the OCP EMEA Summit 2025 tracks the reliability of about 3,600 single-phase immersion-cooled servers in a tier-1 data centre in Asia-Pacific from 2023 to early 2025.

On this page

Overview

The deck was presented by Austin Hipes in the Immersion Cooling track of the OCP EMEA Summit 2025 in Dublin. It reports the field reliability of about 3,600 single-phase immersion-cooled Xeon servers in a tier-1 data centre in Asia-Pacific, tracked quarterly from 2023 to early 2025. The deployment consists of 3,590 servers: 2,932 2nd-gen and 658 3rd-gen Xeon. They sit in single-phase immersion tanks with PAO4 dielectric, run 24x7 and were deployed between 2H 2022 and 2H 2023. The facility hosts air-cooled, direct-to-chip and immersion servers side by side.

Failures are broken down by component, with failures caused by the air-to-immersion conversion and by cable choice separated out. All reported failures number 202 on 2,932 2nd-gen servers (about 0.9% average per quarter) and 76 on 658 3rd-gen servers (about 1.9%). Excluding conversion-related and DAC cable failures leaves 133 failures (0.6%) for 2nd gen, of which memory is 36% and HDD 23%.

Downtime is converted into availability: fleet uptime is above 99.999%, with about 443 million power-on hours and 1,112 h total downtime. Memory and drives dominate failures. Limit: it covers one facility and one hardware family, yet it is one of the few published fleet-scale reliability datasets for immersion.

Key points

  1. 3,590 servers (2,932 2nd-gen and 658 3rd-gen Xeon) in single-phase immersion tanks with PAO4 dielectric, 24x7 duty, deployed 2H 2022 to 2H 2023.
  2. All reported failures: 202 on 2,932 2nd-gen servers (about 0.9% average per quarter) and 76 on 658 3rd-gen servers (about 1.9%).
  3. Excluding conversion-related and DAC cable failures: 133 failures (0.6%) for 2nd gen; memory 36% and HDD 23%.
  4. Fleet uptime above 99.999%: about 443 million power-on hours with 1,112 h total downtime.
  5. The facility hosts air-cooled, direct-to-chip and immersion servers side by side.

Using it in design

  • Give immersion tank and server catalogue items a field-reliability reference (AFR), and use component-level AFRs in the reliability module rather than assuming immersion degrades availability.
  • Flag conversion of air-cooled servers (cables, PSU firmware) as a reliability risk in design notes.
  • Include memory and drives in the spares plan as the dominant failure sources in immersion fleets.
  • Treat the results as single-facility data; do not generalise directly to other fluids or hardware.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Check cooling capacity alongside your design

Review zone heat loads, available capacity and the capacity balance after the largest unit is lost in SoSo CAD.

Request a demo
Zone heat loads and capacity balance in the SoSo CAD cooling workspace

Who should read it

Designers evaluating immersion cooling, and operations and reliability engineers.

Related standards

  • OCP Immersion Requirements

Publication details

Authors
Austin Hipes
Publisher
Open Compute Project Foundation
Year
2025
Document number
OCP EMEA Summit 2025, Immersion Cooling track
Event
OCP EMEA Summit 2025, Dublin
Document language
English
Source type
Industry body
Access
Free to read
Licence
Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document

Citation

Austin Hipes (2025). Immersion Server Demonstrated Reliability at Datacenter Scale Deployment (OCP EMEA Summit 2025). Open Compute Project Foundation. OCP EMEA Summit 2025, Immersion Cooling track. OCP EMEA Summit 2025, Dublin. https://drive.google.com/file/d/168h6CsA4weoNITyBx9lMdPiypScZLv8L/view

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.