WP#30 - Qualitative Analysis of Cooling Architectures
The Green Grid · Bob Blough, John Bean et al.
The Green Grid white paper that qualitatively compares popular data centre cooling architectures on energy efficiency and other facility aspects.
On this page
Overview
This document is The Green Grid's white paper number 30, dated 1 March 2011. Its editor is Bob Blough of Emerson. The paper compares popular data centre cooling architectures qualitatively. Each architecture has its own advantages and drawbacks, which affect energy efficiency and other aspects of the facility. The Green Grid is an industry consortium working on data centre energy efficiency, and this paper sits in its library. The date also reminds readers that it reflects industry thinking of that period.
The aim is to help readers choose the cooling architecture that fits their data centre strategy. Its approach is a qualitative assessment that sets the pros and cons of the options side by side, not a numerical calculation. That makes it suitable as a structure for comparing cooling options in a design tool, although it cannot replace a quantitative PUE and cost comparison.
Access to the paper requires a registration form, and only the publication date, editor and abstract from The Green Grid library page were used here; the full text was not read. Which architectures are covered and the details of the assessment criteria are therefore not stated here. Readers should consult the original for those details.
Key points
- The paper is dated 1 March 2011; the editor is Bob Blough (Emerson).
- It compares popular cooling architectures qualitatively.
- Each architecture's pros and cons affect energy efficiency and other facility aspects.
- The aim is to help choose the architecture that fits the data centre strategy.
- Being qualitative, it does not replace a numeric PUE and cost comparison.
Using it in design
- In a cooling option matrix, present architectures (room CRAH, in-row, rear-door, chilled-water versus DX, economised) with qualitative pros and cons.
- Show this qualitative matrix next to the tool's quantitative PUE and cost comparison.
- Justify the choice by linking it to the client's data centre strategy.
Monthly newsletter · free
Keep your reading list current
Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.
SoSo CAD
Check cooling capacity alongside your design
Review zone heat loads, available capacity and the capacity balance after the largest unit is lost in SoSo CAD.
Request a demo
Who should read it
Designers comparing cooling architecture options and those making investment decisions, as an introductory source.
Publication details
- Authors
- Bob Blough; John Bean; Robb Jones; Mike Patterson; Rich Jones; Rob Salvatore
- Publisher
- The Green Grid
- Year
- 2011
- Document number
- WP 30
- Document language
- English
- Source type
- Industry body
- Access
- Citation only
- Licence
- Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document
Original licence note
Download requires a free TGG account sign-in and is governed by The Green Grid Terms of Use; summary and facts from the public library landing page; full text not redistributed.
Citation
Bob Blough; John Bean; Robb Jones; Mike Patterson; Rich Jones; Rob Salvatore (2011). WP#30 - Qualitative Analysis of Cooling Architectures. The Green Grid. WP 30. https://www.thegreengrid.org/en/resources/library-and-tools/389-WP%23-30---Qualitative-Analysis-of-Cooling-Architectures
Events on this subject
Browse the events calendarAll content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.