White paperCitation2011

WP#30 - Qualitative Analysis of Cooling Architectures

The Green Grid · Bob Blough, John Bean et al.

The Green Grid white paper that qualitatively compares popular data centre cooling architectures on energy efficiency and other facility aspects.

On this page

Overview

This document is The Green Grid's white paper number 30, dated 1 March 2011. Its editor is Bob Blough of Emerson. The paper compares popular data centre cooling architectures qualitatively. Each architecture has its own advantages and drawbacks, which affect energy efficiency and other aspects of the facility. The Green Grid is an industry consortium working on data centre energy efficiency, and this paper sits in its library. The date also reminds readers that it reflects industry thinking of that period.

The aim is to help readers choose the cooling architecture that fits their data centre strategy. Its approach is a qualitative assessment that sets the pros and cons of the options side by side, not a numerical calculation. That makes it suitable as a structure for comparing cooling options in a design tool, although it cannot replace a quantitative PUE and cost comparison.

Access to the paper requires a registration form, and only the publication date, editor and abstract from The Green Grid library page were used here; the full text was not read. Which architectures are covered and the details of the assessment criteria are therefore not stated here. Readers should consult the original for those details.

Key points

  1. The paper is dated 1 March 2011; the editor is Bob Blough (Emerson).
  2. It compares popular cooling architectures qualitatively.
  3. Each architecture's pros and cons affect energy efficiency and other facility aspects.
  4. The aim is to help choose the architecture that fits the data centre strategy.
  5. Being qualitative, it does not replace a numeric PUE and cost comparison.

Using it in design

  • In a cooling option matrix, present architectures (room CRAH, in-row, rear-door, chilled-water versus DX, economised) with qualitative pros and cons.
  • Show this qualitative matrix next to the tool's quantitative PUE and cost comparison.
  • Justify the choice by linking it to the client's data centre strategy.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Check cooling capacity alongside your design

Review zone heat loads, available capacity and the capacity balance after the largest unit is lost in SoSo CAD.

Request a demo
Zone heat loads and capacity balance in the SoSo CAD cooling workspace

Who should read it

Designers comparing cooling architecture options and those making investment decisions, as an introductory source.

Publication details

Authors
Bob Blough; John Bean; Robb Jones; Mike Patterson; Rich Jones; Rob Salvatore
Publisher
The Green Grid
Year
2011
Document number
WP 30
Document language
English
Source type
Industry body
Access
Citation only
Licence
Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document
Original licence note

Download requires a free TGG account sign-in and is governed by The Green Grid Terms of Use; summary and facts from the public library landing page; full text not redistributed.

Citation

Bob Blough; John Bean; Robb Jones; Mike Patterson; Rich Jones; Rob Salvatore (2011). WP#30 - Qualitative Analysis of Cooling Architectures. The Green Grid. WP 30. https://www.thegreengrid.org/en/resources/library-and-tools/389-WP%23-30---Qualitative-Analysis-of-Cooling-Architectures

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.