WP#41 - Survey Results: Data Center Economizer Use
The Green Grid · Jessica Kaiser, John Bean et al.
This 2011 Green Grid white paper reports the results of a survey measuring awareness, perceptions and use of economizers in data centers.
On this page
Overview
The paper presents the results of a survey carried out by The Green Grid in early 2011 and is dated 10 October 2011. The survey topic is awareness, perception and use of economizers in the data center industry. The authors are Jessica Kaiser, John Bean, Tom Harvey, Michael Patterson and Jessica Winiecki. This record rests only on the abstract and details on the library's public landing page; a free account sign-in is required for the full text. The method is a survey, so the results are respondents' reported awareness, opinions and practice rather than measured energy savings.
The abstract gives no numeric breakdown of which economizer types are used or in what proportion, so no percentages or site counts are stated here. What can be taken from the paper is the general trend. The main finding is that economizers were well known across the industry and that adoption was becoming fairly widespread. This suggests that free cooling was no longer considered rare or experimental but an ordinary option to be evaluated at the start of cooling design.
The design reading of this is that economizer options should be offered by default in the cooling design workflow. The limits of the paper are clear. It dates from 2011 and does not reflect later practice, changes in operating temperature ranges or newer cooling technologies. ASHRAE 90.4 is named as a related standard; economizer use is read together with documents of this kind, which discuss energy-efficiency requirements.
Key points
- The paper is dated 10 October 2011.
- The survey was conducted in early 2011.
- It covers awareness, perceptions and use of economizers.
- Economizers were found to be well known across the industry, with fairly widespread adoption.
- Results are survey data, not measured energy savings.
- The record rests only on the library's public abstract page; the full text needs a free account sign-in.
- ASHRAE 90.4 is named as a related standard.
Using it in design
- Offer air-side and water-side economizer modes by default in the cooling wizard.
- Compute economizer hours from site weather data.
- Cite the survey context in help text to show that economizers are a common practice.
- Ask for the rationale to be documented in designs that disable the economizer option.
- Use the results only as context, not as a quantitative benchmark.
Monthly newsletter · free
Keep your reading list current
Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.
SoSo CAD
Check cooling capacity alongside your design
Review zone heat loads, available capacity and the capacity balance after the largest unit is lost in SoSo CAD.
Request a demo
Who should read it
Mechanical designers and energy-efficiency consultants evaluating economizer options in cooling system design.
Related standards
- ASHRAE 90.4
Publication details
- Authors
- Jessica Kaiser; John Bean; Tom Harvey; Michael Patterson; Jessica Winiecki
- Publisher
- The Green Grid
- Year
- 2011
- Document number
- WP 41
- Document language
- English
- Source type
- Industry body
- Access
- Citation only
- Licence
- Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document
Original licence note
Download requires a free TGG account sign-in and is governed by The Green Grid Terms of Use; summary and facts from the public library landing page; full text not redistributed.
Citation
Jessica Kaiser; John Bean; Tom Harvey; Michael Patterson; Jessica Winiecki (2011). WP#41 - Survey Results: Data Center Economizer Use. The Green Grid. WP 41. https://www.thegreengrid.org/resources/library-and-tools/wp-41-survey-results-data-center-economizer-use
Events on this subject
Browse the events calendarAll content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.