Adoption of Variable Cooling Systems to Optimize Data Center Infrastructure
Vertiv
This Vertiv white paper explains why modern IT loads are dynamic and how cooling units should follow them using variable components.
On this page
Overview
The starting point is load variability: server power now varies across roughly 45-106% of peak depending on platform, against about 20% variation two decades earlier. A fixed-speed cooling unit can follow that swing only by cycling on and off, so the paper walks through each cooling-unit component and compares how it can adapt to load.
On compressors it compares multiple fixed compressors, continuously modulating (digital scroll) and variable-speed compressors. In digital modulation, a 15 s cycle with 7.5 s loaded gives 50% capacity and 11 s loaded gives 73%. Variable-speed compressors offer about 7:1 turndown, with a 1,000-7,200 rpm range covering 20-100% capacity.
Fans, valves and pumps add further savings. Variable-speed fans can save up to 76% of fan energy, a 10% airflow reduction saves up to 33% of fan energy, and EC fans averaged 18% savings versus VFDs. Electronic expansion valves can save up to 15% energy compared with thermostatic valves. For chilled-water systems the paper covers pressure-independent control valves and variable-speed pumped economizers.
As control strategy, supply-air temperature control is preferred over return-air control because rising server delta-T makes return-air setpoints unreliable. The paper closes by listing which variable components come standard in each cooling-unit size range. As a vendor document, its figures reflect the manufacturer's view.
Key points
- Server power varies across roughly 45-106% of peak by platform, versus about 20% two decades earlier.
- Digital modulation example: in a 15 s cycle, 7.5 s loaded gives 50% capacity and 11 s gives 73%.
- Variable-speed compressors give about 7:1 turndown; 1,000-7,200 rpm covers 20-100% capacity.
- Variable-speed fans save up to 76% of fan energy; a 10% airflow cut saves up to 33%; EC fans averaged 18% savings versus VFDs.
- Electronic expansion valves can save up to 15% versus thermostatic expansion valves.
- Supply-air temperature control is preferred because rising server delta-T makes return-air setpoints unreliable.
- For chilled water the paper covers pressure-independent control valves and variable-speed pumped economizers.
Using it in design
- In the cooling-unit catalog record compressor modulation type (fixed staged, digital, inverter), fan type (EC/AC/VFD), valve type (EEV/TXV, PICV) and control mode (supply or return air).
- Use part-load efficiency curves in the energy model rather than full-load EER.
- Recommend supply-air control for contained, high delta-T halls.
- Warn on fixed-speed compressors where the load is expected to vary widely.
Monthly newsletter · free
Keep your reading list current
Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.
SoSo CAD
Check cooling capacity alongside your design
Review zone heat loads, available capacity and the capacity balance after the largest unit is lost in SoSo CAD.
Request a demo
Who should read it
Mechanical designers selecting cooling units and energy analysts modelling part-load efficiency.
Related standards
- ASHRAE TC 9.9 Thermal Guidelines
- ASHRAE 90.4
- AHRI 1360
Publication details
- Authors
- Vertiv
- Publisher
- Vertiv
- Year
- 2020
- Document number
- SL-70653
- Document language
- English
- Source type
- Manufacturer
- Access
- Free to read
- Licence
- Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document
Citation
Vertiv (2020). Adoption of Variable Cooling Systems to Optimize Data Center Infrastructure. Vertiv. SL-70653. https://www.vertiv.com/4a47fc/globalassets/documents/white-papers/vertiv-variable-cooling-technolog-data-center-wp-en-na-sl-70653_312508_0.pdf
Events on this subject
Browse the events calendarAll content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.