Research paperPDF2026

Comparative Analysis of Large Load Interconnection Requirements Across U.S. Transmission Entities

CIGRE US National Committee, 2026 Grid of the Future Symposium (arXiv preprint) · Rafi Zahedi, Rahul Anilkumar et al.

A comparison of large-load interconnection rules across eleven U.S. entities (AEP, Ameren, CAISO, Dominion, Duke, ERCOT, LIPA, MISO, PJM, Southern Company, SPP) under seven categories, including fault ride-through, curtailment, dispatchability, power quality and reactive power.

CC0 1.0 — public domain dedication; free to reuse

On this page

Overview

The rapid growth of large loads, especially AI-driven data centres, is creating unprecedented demands on the North American electric grid. Data centres account for nearly 80% of large-load interconnection requests in the Western Interconnection, and DOE projects U.S. data-centre use of 325-580 TWh by 2028. Despite this, technical interconnection requirements for large loads have not yet matured and contain gaps. The paper compares eleven entities across seven technical categories: large-load definition, load data and modelling, fault ride-through, load curtailment and shedding, dispatchability, power quality and reactive power control.

The lowest large-load threshold is 10 MW (SPP, loads at 69 kV); LIPA uses 20 MW and 50 MW is the most common threshold. ERCOT's proposed VRT: continuous 0.90-1.10 pu, current during disturbances not above 150% of normal maximum for no more than 0.5 s, and return to at least 90% of pre-disturbance consumption within 2 s after voltage exceeds 0.90 pu. SPP requires staying connected through at least six fault-clearing attempts within 90 s and prohibits constant-power control during disturbances; Dominion requires riding through at least six reclosing attempts of 50-70 ms. CAISO requires up to 6.0 s ride-through in the 0.70-0.90 pu band, roughly 3× the 2.0 s required by ERCOT, SPP, MISO and LIPA; all five numeric envelopes permit tripping above 1.20 pu.

Ramp-rate limits: Southern 20 MW/min, Duke 10 MW/min, MISO 30 MW/min (plus 10 MW max change in a sliding 5 s window), SPP 20 MW/min, LIPA 20 MW/min, CAISO 20 MW/min. Southern Company FFT oscillation limit: 10 MW max per 0.1 Hz bin for 0.1-5 Hz and 2.5 MW for 5-55 Hz; LIPA caps any two adjacent bins at 10 MW and all bins at 20 MW in 0.1-5 Hz, and 3.5 MW in 5-55 Hz. MISO's proposal requires withstanding three voltage disturbances within 10 s and phase-angle jumps up to 25 degrees.

The maturity assessment finds LIPA covering all categories and Dominion/Duke close behind, while dispatchability and oscillation limits remain inconsistent. The authors argue that on-site generators and BESS let hyperscale sites act as grid resources rather than only loads. Limits: rules are evolving quickly and measurement methods differ between entities; it is a preprint.

Key points

  1. Data centres make up nearly 80% of large-load interconnection requests in the Western Interconnection; DOE projects U.S. data-centre use of 325-580 TWh by 2028.
  2. The lowest large-load threshold is 10 MW (SPP, loads at 69 kV); LIPA uses 20 MW and 50 MW is the most common threshold.
  3. ERCOT's proposed VRT: continuous 0.90-1.10 pu, current during disturbances not above 150% of normal maximum for no more than 0.5 s, and return to at least 90% of pre-disturbance consumption within 2 s after voltage exceeds 0.90 pu.
  4. SPP requires staying connected through at least six fault-clearing attempts within 90 s and prohibits constant-power control during disturbances; Dominion requires riding through at least six reclosing attempts of 50-70 ms.
  5. CAISO requires up to 6.0 s ride-through in the 0.70-0.90 pu band, roughly 3× the 2.0 s required by ERCOT, SPP, MISO and LIPA; all five numeric envelopes permit tripping above 1.20 pu.
  6. Ramp-rate limits: Southern 20 MW/min, Duke 10 MW/min, MISO 30 MW/min (plus 10 MW max change in a sliding 5 s window), SPP 20 MW/min, LIPA 20 MW/min, CAISO 20 MW/min.
  7. Southern Company FFT oscillation limit: 10 MW max per 0.1 Hz bin for 0.1-5 Hz and 2.5 MW for 5-55 Hz; LIPA caps any two adjacent bins at 10 MW and all bins at 20 MW in 0.1-5 Hz, and 3.5 MW in 5-55 Hz.
  8. MISO's proposal requires withstanding three voltage disturbances within 10 s and phase-angle jumps up to 25 degrees.

Using it in design

  • Design data-centre UPS and load control to the most restrictive entity's requirement: 6.0 s ride-through at 0.70-0.90 pu (CAISO), six fault-clearing attempts within 90 s (SPP), six 50-70 ms reclosings (Dominion), and the ban on constant-power control (SPP).
  • Make ramp limits (10-30 MW/min) and FFT oscillation limits (Southern: 10 MW per bin at 0.1-5 Hz, 2.5 MW at 5-55 Hz) inputs to the load profile and storage sizing.
  • Add the post-disturbance recovery target (ERCOT proposal: at least 90% within 2 s) to UPS and load-reconnection logic.
  • Verify the large-load definition (10-50 MW thresholds) early in application scoping.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Review your power design in SoSo CAD

Inspect supply paths, equipment loads and UPS failure scenarios in one model.

Request a demo
Single-line diagram in the SoSo CAD power and capacity workspace

Who should read it

Grid engineers and designers preparing large data-centre load interconnection across several U.S. entities.

Document contents

  1. 1. Introduction
  2. 2. Comparative Findings of U.S. Transmission Entities (2.1 Large load definition, 2.2 Load data and modeling, 2.3 Fault ride-through, 2.4 Load curtailment and load shedding, 2.5 Dispatchability, 2.6 Power quality, 2.7 Reactive power control)
  3. 3. Conclusion

Related standards

  • IEEE 2800-2022
  • NERC PRC-029-1
  • ITI (CBEMA) curve
  • IEEE 519
  • IEEE 1453

Read the document

large-load-interconnection-requirements-us-2026.pdf

PDF · 0.5 MB · English

CC0 1.0 — public domain dedication; free to reuse

The document is provided unaltered because its licence permits redistribution.

Publication details

Authors
Rafi Zahedi; Rahul Anilkumar; Amin Zamani
Publisher
CIGRE US National Committee, 2026 Grid of the Future Symposium (arXiv preprint)
Year
2026
Document number
arXiv:2610.36645
Document language
English
Source type
Scientific
Access
Open licence — downloadable
Licence
CC0 1.0 — public domain dedication; free to reuse
Licence evidence
arxiv.org
Original licence note

arXiv record licence is http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (CC0, checked via arXiv OAI-PMH)

Citation

Rafi Zahedi; Rahul Anilkumar; Amin Zamani (2026). Comparative Analysis of Large Load Interconnection Requirements Across U.S. Transmission Entities. CIGRE US National Committee, 2026 Grid of the Future Symposium (arXiv preprint). arXiv:2610.36645. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2610.36645

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.