Understanding the Total Sustainability Impact of Li-ion UPS Batteries
Schneider Electric · Raymond Lizotte, Wendy Torell
A Schneider Electric white paper that compares lithium-ion and VRLA UPS batteries across the whole lifecycle, from mining to end of life, and concludes that Li-ion has the lower impact today.
On this page
Overview
The paper judges battery choice over four lifecycle phases rather than operating life and price alone: raw-material mining, manufacturing, operation, and end-of-life repurposing or recycling. The comparison is between lithium-ion and valve-regulated lead-acid (VRLA). Best practices and vendor attributes are listed for each phase, so a reader finds items that can be carried straight into a purchasing specification. Each phase is treated separately, so a weakness in one phase is not hidden by strength in another.
The conclusion is that, on balance, Li-ion has the lower lifecycle impact today. In the quantitative comparison Li-ion scores lower on most of nine environmental metrics. Two reasons stand out: smaller mass and fewer replacements. For comparable runtime in the example UPS, VRLA batteries weigh about 11,340 kg (25,000 lb) against about 2,767 kg (6,100 lb) for Li-ion. VRLA is typically replaced about twice over a 10-year UPS life, whereas Li-ion often lasts the whole UPS life.
The paper is candid about its limit, which is end of life. Lead-acid batteries have about a 99.3% return-for-recycling rate in the US, while the Li-ion recycling chain is less mature. Li-ion's advantage therefore rests on mining, manufacturing and operation gains outweighing an uncertain end of life. The balance should be revisited as recycling infrastructure matures, and replacement count remains as decisive as mass in both the waste and the cost calculation.
Key points
- Example UPS battery mass for comparable runtime: VRLA about 11,340 kg (25,000 lb), Li-ion about 2,767 kg (6,100 lb).
- VRLA is typically replaced about 2 times over a 10-year UPS life.
- Li-ion often lasts the whole UPS life.
- Lead-acid batteries have about a 99.3% return-for-recycling rate in the US.
- Li-ion shows lower impact on most of nine environmental metrics in the quantitative comparison.
- Four lifecycle phases are covered: mining, manufacturing, operation, end of life.
- The Li-ion recycling chain is less mature than lead-acid's.
Using it in design
- Give the battery catalog these fields: chemistry, mass per kWh, design life, replacements over UPS life and recycling rate.
- Use battery mass in the structural floor-load check: roughly four times the weight for VRLA at the same runtime can drive slab capacity.
- Default replacements to 2 per 10 years for VRLA and 0 for Li-ion, and carry them into TCO and embodied-carbon calculations.
- Use the per-phase best practices as a checklist in the supplier specification.
Monthly newsletter · free
Keep your reading list current
Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.
SoSo CAD
Review your power design in SoSo CAD
Inspect supply paths, equipment loads and UPS failure scenarios in one model.
Request a demo
Who should read it
Design engineers selecting UPS batteries and decision makers who need a total-cost and sustainability comparison.
Related standards
- IEC 62040-3
- IEC 62619
- UL 9540A
- NFPA 855
Publication details
- Authors
- Raymond Lizotte; Wendy Torell
- Publisher
- Schneider Electric
- Year
- 2021
- Document number
- WP 71
- Document language
- English
- Source type
- Manufacturer
- Access
- Free to read
- Licence
- Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document
Citation
Raymond Lizotte; Wendy Torell (2021). Understanding the Total Sustainability Impact of Li-ion UPS Batteries. Schneider Electric. WP 71. https://download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SPD_WP71_EN
Events on this subject
- Electricity Eurasia 2027
- The smarter E Europe (Intersolar Europe, ees Europe, Power2Drive, EM-Power)
- Data Centre World Paris
All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.