Technical guideFree to read2018

Paralleling Generator Set Systems and Design

Caterpillar · Don Dentino

Caterpillar LEXE1365-01 (Don Dentino, 2018) compares three generic strategies for paralleling generator sets: controls mounted on each set, stand-alone paralleling controls, and fully integrated paralleling switchgear.

On this page

Overview

For each strategy the paper sets out functions, typical applications, advantages and drawbacks across cost, flexibility, redundancy, factory testing and site-integration burden. On-set controls are positioned as low-cost for simple LV island systems, controls-only for MV/HV and retrofits, and integrated switchgear as the most flexible and redundant choice for complex or utility-paralleled systems.

On-generator controls provide dead-bus arbitration, auto and manual synchronising, kW and kVAR sharing, load shed and add, and optional load-demand set cycling. They are typically limited to low voltage (under 600 V); MV uses remote controls-only arrangements. The connecting switching device needs about a 5-cycle close and open time to avoid out-of-phase paralleling, and without master controls these systems are mostly limited to an isolated common bus or a single generator to utility.

Controls-only solutions typically lack utility-grade protective relays and must be wired to the distribution switchgear on site. Integrated paralleling switchgear allows redundant PLCs, networks and relays, factory integration testing and metal-clad, arc-resistant construction, at higher cost.

Key points

  1. Three strategies: on-set controls, controls-only panels or PLCs, integrated paralleling switchgear.
  2. On-set paralleling is typically limited to under 600 V; MV needs remote controls-only arrangements.
  3. The connecting device needs about 5-cycle close/open speed to avoid out-of-phase paralleling.
  4. Without master controls, on-set systems are mostly limited to an isolated common bus or one generator to utility.
  5. Controls-only solutions lack utility-grade protective relays and need site interconnection to distribution switchgear.
  6. Integrated switchgear offers redundant PLCs, networks and relays, factory integration testing and arc-resistant construction.

Using it in design

  • Build an architecture selector with the three options and show consequences: LV-only limit for on-set, required breaker closing speed, and master-controller need for complex sequences.
  • For MV generator plants or utility-paralleled designs, default to controls-only or integrated switchgear.
  • For Tier IV or other high-redundancy designs, prompt for redundant PLCs and protective relaying.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Review your power design in SoSo CAD

Inspect supply paths, equipment loads and UPS failure scenarios in one model.

Request a demo
Single-line diagram in the SoSo CAD power and capacity workspace

Who should read it

Electrical designers choosing a paralleling architecture and specifiers of paralleling switchgear.

Related standards

  • NFPA 110
  • UL 1558
  • IEEE C37.20.2

Publication details

Authors
Don Dentino
Publisher
Caterpillar
Year
2018
Document number
LEXE1365-01
Document language
English
Source type
Manufacturer
Access
Free to read
Licence
Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document

Citation

Don Dentino (2018). Paralleling Generator Set Systems and Design. Caterpillar. LEXE1365-01. https://www.finning.com/content/dam/finning/en_gb/Documents/Industries/ElectricPower/cat-white-papers-march-2024/Paralleling%20Generator%20Set%20Systems%20And%20Design%20(LEXE1365-01).pdf

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.