Paralleling Generator Set Systems and Design
Caterpillar · Don Dentino
Caterpillar LEXE1365-01 (Don Dentino, 2018) compares three generic strategies for paralleling generator sets: controls mounted on each set, stand-alone paralleling controls, and fully integrated paralleling switchgear.
On this page
Overview
For each strategy the paper sets out functions, typical applications, advantages and drawbacks across cost, flexibility, redundancy, factory testing and site-integration burden. On-set controls are positioned as low-cost for simple LV island systems, controls-only for MV/HV and retrofits, and integrated switchgear as the most flexible and redundant choice for complex or utility-paralleled systems.
On-generator controls provide dead-bus arbitration, auto and manual synchronising, kW and kVAR sharing, load shed and add, and optional load-demand set cycling. They are typically limited to low voltage (under 600 V); MV uses remote controls-only arrangements. The connecting switching device needs about a 5-cycle close and open time to avoid out-of-phase paralleling, and without master controls these systems are mostly limited to an isolated common bus or a single generator to utility.
Controls-only solutions typically lack utility-grade protective relays and must be wired to the distribution switchgear on site. Integrated paralleling switchgear allows redundant PLCs, networks and relays, factory integration testing and metal-clad, arc-resistant construction, at higher cost.
Key points
- Three strategies: on-set controls, controls-only panels or PLCs, integrated paralleling switchgear.
- On-set paralleling is typically limited to under 600 V; MV needs remote controls-only arrangements.
- The connecting device needs about 5-cycle close/open speed to avoid out-of-phase paralleling.
- Without master controls, on-set systems are mostly limited to an isolated common bus or one generator to utility.
- Controls-only solutions lack utility-grade protective relays and need site interconnection to distribution switchgear.
- Integrated switchgear offers redundant PLCs, networks and relays, factory integration testing and arc-resistant construction.
Using it in design
- Build an architecture selector with the three options and show consequences: LV-only limit for on-set, required breaker closing speed, and master-controller need for complex sequences.
- For MV generator plants or utility-paralleled designs, default to controls-only or integrated switchgear.
- For Tier IV or other high-redundancy designs, prompt for redundant PLCs and protective relaying.
Monthly newsletter · free
Keep your reading list current
Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.
SoSo CAD
Review your power design in SoSo CAD
Inspect supply paths, equipment loads and UPS failure scenarios in one model.
Request a demo
Who should read it
Electrical designers choosing a paralleling architecture and specifiers of paralleling switchgear.
Related standards
- NFPA 110
- UL 1558
- IEEE C37.20.2
Publication details
- Authors
- Don Dentino
- Publisher
- Caterpillar
- Year
- 2018
- Document number
- LEXE1365-01
- Document language
- English
- Source type
- Manufacturer
- Access
- Free to read
- Licence
- Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document
Citation
Don Dentino (2018). Paralleling Generator Set Systems and Design. Caterpillar. LEXE1365-01. https://www.finning.com/content/dam/finning/en_gb/Documents/Industries/ElectricPower/cat-white-papers-march-2024/Paralleling%20Generator%20Set%20Systems%20And%20Design%20(LEXE1365-01).pdf
Events on this subject
- Electricity Eurasia 2027
- ELECO 2026 Elektrik-Elektronik ve Biyomedikal Mühendisliği Konferansı
- ICCI 2027 – Uluslararası Enerji ve Çevre Fuarı ve Konferansı
All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.