White paperFree to read2012

The Different Technologies for Cooling Data Centers

Schneider Electric · Tony Evans

This paper classifies the basic ways of collecting heat from the IT space and moving it outdoors. It gives each method's components, pros and cons, and selection drivers.

On this page

Overview

The paper is a taxonomy describing the basic ways to collect heat from the IT space and move it outdoors. It covers air-cooled DX, glycol-cooled, water-cooled and chilled-water systems, pumped refrigerant, self-contained and rooftop units, direct fresh-air evaporative cooling and indirect air economizers. Each method is shown as a simple loop diagram with its main components and a list of pros and cons. In total 13 basic heat-removal methods are identified, 11 of which rely on the refrigeration cycle as the primary means of cooling. This allows the options to be compared quickly.

Pumped refrigerant systems isolate the primary heat-removal loop (chilled water) from the IT equipment, keeping water out of the white space. Direct and indirect air methods depend on outdoor conditions as the primary cooling source and suit mild climates. The paper also states what the choice should follow: uptime requirement, power density, location and climate, size of the IT space, available building systems, and time and budget. It offers a conceptual comparison rather than capacity calculations, so current equipment efficiencies should be verified separately.

The taxonomy is a natural base for a cooling-plant catalogue: each type can carry attributes such as heat-rejection medium, water need, economizer capability and typical scale. A wizard should filter these types by climate and IT load scale; for example, air-side economizers should be offered only in mild or cool climates.

Key points

  1. 13 basic heat-removal methods are identified; 11 rely on the refrigeration cycle as the primary means
  2. Pumped refrigerant systems isolate the chilled-water loop from the IT equipment, keeping water out of the white space
  3. Direct and indirect air methods depend on outdoor conditions and suit mild climates
  4. Selection drivers: uptime, power density, location/climate, IT space size, building systems, time and budget
  5. Systems covered: DX, glycol, water-cooled, chilled water, pumped refrigerant, self-contained, rooftop, direct fresh air, indirect economizer

Using it in design

  • Use the 13 methods to seed the cooling-plant catalogue enum (dx_air, dx_glycol, dx_water, chw_crah, pumped_refrigerant, self_contained, rooftop, direct_fresh_air_evap, indirect_air_economizer)
  • Give each type heat-rejection medium, water need, economizer capability and typical scale attributes
  • In the wizard, filter types by climate (air-side economizers only for mild or cool climates)
  • Also filter types by IT load scale

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Check cooling capacity alongside your design

Review zone heat loads, available capacity and the capacity balance after the largest unit is lost in SoSo CAD.

Request a demo
Zone heat loads and capacity balance in the SoSo CAD cooling workspace

Who should read it

Designers selecting a cooling system type and engineers new to data-centre cooling.

Related standards

  • ASHRAE TC9.9 Thermal Guidelines
  • ASHRAE 90.4

Publication details

Authors
Tony Evans
Publisher
Schneider Electric
Year
2012
Document number
WP 59
Document language
English
Source type
Manufacturer
Access
Free to read
Licence
Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document

Citation

Tony Evans (2012). The Different Technologies for Cooling Data Centers. Schneider Electric. WP 59. https://download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SPD_VAVR-5UDTU5_EN

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.