Characterizing Data Center Cooling System Water Stress in the United States (2022 ASHRAE Annual Conference paper)
ASHRAE · Li Chen, Aaron P. Wemhoff
Li Chen and Aaron P. Wemhoff propose Water Scarcity Usage Effectiveness (WSUE), which weights on-site cooling water and the water embedded in purchased electricity by the scarcity of the basins they come from. It shows strong location dependence and that dry design is not always better.
On this page
Overview
The paper was presented at the ASHRAE 2022 Annual Conference; its authors are Li Chen and Aaron P. Wemhoff. The accepted manuscript is openly available through NSF PAR (10341797). The proposed metric is intended to support siting and cooling-system selection.
WSUE combines a scarcity-weighted on-site WUE term with a scarcity-weighted source (electricity) term multiplied by PUE. WUE_source = EWIF x PUE + WUE, where EWIF is the energy water intensity factor of the supplying grid. The authors use balancing-authority-level electricity and water-transfer data for the contiguous US.
The modelling covers three cooling systems, each for a 400 kW IT load: CRAH with chillers and cooling towers, DX CRAC units, and pure evaporative cooling. The CRAC model has 100 kW per unit, 20 C supply air, 2.0 m3/s indoor and 4.0 m3/s outdoor airflow, and COP varying with condensing temperature. Several climates are examined.
The main finding is that WSUE depends strongly on location, and that depending on the grid's water footprint a water-intensive cooling solution can yield a lower WSUE than one with little or no on-site water use. As a limit, the model rests on 400 kW examples and US data.
Key points
- WSUE combines a scarcity-weighted on-site WUE term with a scarcity-weighted source (electricity) term multiplied by PUE.
- WUE_source = EWIF x PUE + WUE, where EWIF is the energy water intensity factor of the supplying grid.
- Three modelled systems: CRAH with chillers and cooling towers, DX CRAC units, and pure evaporative cooling, each for a 400 kW IT load.
- CRAC model: 100 kW per unit, 20 C supply air, 2.0 m3/s indoor and 4.0 m3/s outdoor airflow, COP varying with condensing temperature.
- A water-intensive cooling solution can yield a lower WSUE than one with little or no on-site water use, depending on the grid.
- The metric is intended to support siting and cooling-system selection.
- The accepted manuscript is open on NSF PAR.
Using it in design
- In site comparison, compute both site WUE and source (grid) water using a regional EWIF, and optionally a scarcity-weighted index.
- Do not steer users to dry cooling everywhere on the basis of site WUE alone.
- Compare evaporative and dry designs together with the grid's water footprint.
Monthly newsletter · free
Keep your reading list current
Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.
SoSo CAD
Check cooling capacity alongside your design
Review zone heat loads, available capacity and the capacity balance after the largest unit is lost in SoSo CAD.
Request a demo
Who should read it
Designers and analysts evaluating water sustainability in site selection and cooling-system comparison.
Related standards
- ISO/IEC 30134-9 (WUE)
- The Green Grid WUE
Publication details
- Authors
- Li Chen; Aaron P. Wemhoff
- Publisher
- ASHRAE
- Year
- 2022
- Document number
- ASHRAE Annual Conference papers 2022; NSF PAR 10341797
- Event
- ASHRAE 2022 Annual Conference
- Document language
- English
- Source type
- Standard
- Access
- Free to read
- Licence
- Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document
Citation
Li Chen; Aaron P. Wemhoff (2022). Characterizing Data Center Cooling System Water Stress in the United States (2022 ASHRAE Annual Conference paper). ASHRAE. ASHRAE Annual Conference papers 2022; NSF PAR 10341797. ASHRAE 2022 Annual Conference. https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10341797
Events on this subject
Browse the events calendarAll content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.