Research paperPDF2023

Cooling Technologies for Internet Data Center in China: Principle, Energy Efficiency, and Applications

Energies (MDPI AG) · Xiaofei Huang, Junwei Yan et al.

A broad review of cooling for Chinese internet data centres (IDC), framed by China's dual-carbon policy and provincial PUE caps: environmental envelopes, energy metrics, policy targets, traditional room, row and rack air cooling, and four newer routes (free cooling, liquid cooling, thermal-storage cooling, building envelope).

CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution

On this page

Overview

The energy consumption of internet data centres in China has become a pressing issue with the implementation of the Chinese dual-carbon strategic goals. The review covers air cooling, free cooling, liquid cooling, thermal energy storage cooling and building envelope. It first analyses the environmental requirements for the computer room and the main energy consumption items: cooling accounts for about 35-40% of total IDC energy consumption, the second largest consumer after IT equipment. GB 50174-2017 requires cold-aisle and rack-inlet temperature of 18-27 °C, dew point of 5.5-15 °C and RH not above 60%, and allows 15-32 °C when IT equipment requirements are relaxed.

An MIIT report found more than half of Chinese IDCs have PUE between 1.3 and 1.5, 37% above 1.5 and only a few below 1.2, with most having CLF of 0.15-0.25. Policy targets: large new IDCs below PUE 1.3 by end of 2023, below 1.25 in cold areas, and Guangdong requires new IDCs at no higher than 1.25 by 2025.

Four new cooling technologies are compared with traditional cooling. Free cooling is summarised as climate-dependent, with PUE of 1.4-1.6 and average energy saving of 35-40%; it can be combined with chillers or solar to improve stability. Thermal energy storage cooling can use natural cold sources by shaving peaks but must be coupled with other cooling technologies and needs an operating strategy. Liquid cooling offers higher energy efficiency and lower PUE than other technologies, especially for high-heat-density servers, but is not yet mature and engineering application is not widespread.

Conclusions: traditional cooling consumes a lot of energy and is inefficient because of cold and hot airflow mixing; most old IDCs use air cooling; free cooling is the most mature of the new technologies but strongly depends on geography and climate. Limits: a China-focused review, and figures come from studies under different conditions and cannot be compared directly on the same basis.

Key points

  1. Cooling accounts for about 35-40% of total IDC energy consumption, the second largest consumer after IT equipment.
  2. GB 50174-2017 requires cold-aisle and rack-inlet temperature of 18-27 °C, dew point of 5.5-15 °C and RH not above 60%, and allows 15-32 °C when IT equipment requirements are relaxed.
  3. An MIIT report found more than half of Chinese IDCs have PUE between 1.3 and 1.5, 37% above 1.5 and only a few below 1.2; most have CLF of 0.15-0.25.
  4. Policy targets: large new IDCs below PUE 1.3 by end of 2023, below 1.25 in cold areas; Guangdong requires new IDCs at no higher than 1.25 by 2025.
  5. Free cooling is climate-dependent, with PUE of 1.4-1.6 and average energy saving of 35-40%; it can be combined with chillers or solar to improve stability.
  6. Thermal energy storage cooling can use natural cold sources by shaving peaks but must be coupled with other cooling technologies and needs an operating strategy.

Using it in design

  • In China, define project design targets from GB 50174-2017 temperature and humidity limits (18-27 °C, dew point 5.5-15 °C, RH at most 60%) and provincial PUE caps (for example Guangdong 1.25).
  • Evaluate free cooling by climate (PUE 1.4-1.6, 35-40% saving) and compare liquid cooling as an option for high-heat-density loads.
  • Treat thermal storage cooling as a peak-shaving tool, used with another cooling technology and an operating strategy.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Check cooling capacity alongside your design

Review zone heat loads, available capacity and the capacity balance after the largest unit is lost in SoSo CAD.

Request a demo
Zone heat loads and capacity balance in the SoSo CAD cooling workspace

Who should read it

Designers and policy specialists choosing data-centre cooling technology in China and similarly regulated markets.

Document contents

  1. 1. Introduction
  2. 2. Methodology (2.1 Requirement for Computer Room Environment, 2.2 Performance Criteria: energy efficiency assessment indicator, thermal environment assessment indicator)
  3. 3. Status and Policies for Energy Conservation in China
  4. 4. Traditional Air Cooling (4.2 Terminal of Air Cooling Technology: room-, row- and rack-level air cooling)
  5. 5. New Cooling Technologies (5.1 Free Cooling: direct, indirect; 5.2 Liquid Cooling: cold plate, heat pipe, immersion, spray cooling; 5.3 Thermal Energy Storage; building envelope)
  6. 6. Comparison of Different Cooling Technologies
  7. 7. Conclusions

Related standards

  • GB 50174-2017
  • ASHRAE TC9.9 Thermal Guidelines

Read the document

cooling-technologies-idc-china-review-2023.pdf

PDF · 3.9 MB · English

CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution

The document is provided unaltered because its licence permits redistribution.

Publication details

Authors
Xiaofei Huang; Junwei Yan; Xuan Zhou; Yixin Wu; Shichen Hu
Publisher
Energies (MDPI AG)
Year
2023
Volume
16
Issue
20
Pages
7158
Document language
English
Source type
Scientific
Access
Open licence — downloadable
Licence
CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution
Licence evidence
www.mdpi.com
Original licence note

p.1 states the article is open access under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence.

Citation

Xiaofei Huang; Junwei Yan; Xuan Zhou; Yixin Wu; Shichen Hu (2023). Cooling Technologies for Internet Data Center in China: Principle, Energy Efficiency, and Applications. Energies (MDPI AG). 16(20), 7158. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16207158

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.