Research paperPDF2021

Short Circuit and Arc Flash Study on a Microgrid Facility

arXiv (Texas Tech University) · K. E. K. Schmitt, C. A. Negri et al.

A worked short-circuit and IEEE 1584-2018 arc-flash study by Texas Tech University for a 480 V, MW-scale microgrid testbed, offering a step-by-step template for grid-connected and islanded topologies.

CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution

On this page

Overview

The study asks how to compute and label short-circuit levels and arc-flash risk in a microgrid with a generator, wind, PV and battery inverter. The testbed is fed by a 12.47 kV utility and includes a 569 kVA diesel generator, wind, PV and a battery inverter system. The workflow is listed in six steps: data collection, operating topologies, three-phase bolted fault currents, arcing current and incident energy, PPE category, and equipment labelling.

Faults were computed in PowerWorld for both grid-connected and islanded (generator-slack) topologies, with inverter fault contributions taken as datasheet maximum short-circuit current multiplied by 1.4. The highest fault level at each bus was then used with IEEE 1584-2018 to compute arcing current, incident energy, arc-flash boundary and PPE category. Assumptions: VCB electrode configuration, 5-cycle arc duration, 32 mm gap, 457.2 mm working distance and 508 mm × 508 mm enclosures.

Results: at the 480 V MCC bus the three-phase fault current was 22,793 A grid-connected but only 1,296 A when islanded on the 569 kVA diesel generator. At 480 V buses, bolted current was about 22.8 kA, arcing current about 16.8 kA, incident energy 3.6 cal/cm² and arc-flash boundary 91 cm; at the 208 V buses, 3.8 cal/cm² and 94 cm. All buses fell in PPE category 1. Bare-skin injury starts at about 1.2 cal/cm², and the boundary is defined at 5 J/cm².

Limits: it is a short study; only the highest fault level was used, protection coordination and clearing-time changes are not its focus, and arc duration was assumed fixed. The paper notes that Doan's maximum power method for DC applies only to linear DC sources, not PV. It still provides a compact template for the same workflow in a data-centre LV system with generator backup.

Key points

  1. The arc-flash workflow is listed as six steps: data collection, operating topologies, three-phase bolted fault currents, arcing current and incident energy, PPE category, and equipment labelling.
  2. A factor of 1.4 was applied to the datasheet maximum short-circuit current of inverter-based sources as a safety band.
  3. At the 480 V MCC bus the three-phase fault current was 22,793 A grid-connected but only 1,296 A when islanded on the 569 kVA diesel generator.
  4. Assumptions: VCB electrode configuration, 5-cycle arc duration, 32 mm gap, 457.2 mm working distance, 508 mm × 508 mm enclosures.
  5. At 480 V buses, bolted current was about 22.8 kA, arcing current about 16.8 kA, incident energy 3.6 cal/cm² and arc-flash boundary 91 cm; at 208 V buses, 3.8 cal/cm² and 94 cm; all buses PPE category 1.
  6. Bare-skin injury starts at about 1.2 cal/cm²; the boundary is defined at 5 J/cm². For DC systems, Doan's maximum power method applies only to linear DC sources, not PV.

Using it in design

  • In a data-centre LV system with generator backup, run the arc-flash study for both grid-connected and islanded topologies, and check that the much lower islanded fault current (1,296 A instead of 22,793 A) does not lengthen clearing time.
  • Take inverter fault contribution from the datasheet and multiply by a safety margin (here 1.4), and state that assumption in the study report.
  • Use the six-step workflow as a checklist and generate labels from the highest fault level across topologies.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Review your power design in SoSo CAD

Inspect supply paths, equipment loads and UPS failure scenarios in one model.

Request a demo
Single-line diagram in the SoSo CAD power and capacity workspace

Who should read it

Engineers performing short-circuit and arc-flash labelling studies on low-voltage systems with generators, inverters and batteries.

Document contents

  1. I. Introduction
  2. II. Microgrid Testbed Topology
  3. III. Short Circuit Study
  4. IV. Arc Flash Study
  5. V. Results and Equipment Labeling
  6. VI. Final Considerations

Related standards

  • IEEE 1584-2018
  • NFPA 70E

Read the document

microgrid-short-circuit-arc-flash-study-2021.pdf

PDF · 0.6 MB · English

CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution

The document is provided unaltered because its licence permits redistribution.

Publication details

Authors
K. E. K. Schmitt; C. A. Negri; S. Daneshvardehnavi; S. Bayne; M. Giesselmann
Publisher
arXiv (Texas Tech University)
Year
2021
Document number
arXiv:2105.09927
Document language
English
Source type
Scientific
Access
Open licence — downloadable
Licence
CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution
Licence evidence
arxiv.org
Original licence note

arXiv OAI-PMH metadata gives license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Citation

K. E. K. Schmitt; C. A. Negri; S. Daneshvardehnavi; S. Bayne; M. Giesselmann (2021). Short Circuit and Arc Flash Study on a Microgrid Facility. arXiv (Texas Tech University). arXiv:2105.09927. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2105.09927

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.