Research paperPDF2023

The Energy-Saving Potential of Air-Side Economisers in Modular Data Centres: Analysis of Opportunities and Risks in Different Climates

Sustainability (MDPI AG) · Ali Badiei, Eric Jadowski et al.

A dynamic thermal model of a 90 kW modular (containerised) data centre, calibrated against Open Compute Project PUE values, tests a direct airside economiser with a 24 °C free-cooling threshold in Stockholm, San Francisco, Dubai and Singapore.

CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution

On this page

Overview

The study examines the feasibility of using outside air for free cooling in modular data centres through an air-side economiser as an alternative to traditional mechanical cooling. The base case is a 90 kW modular data centre, with the model calibrated using OCP PUE values of 1.5 (Dubai) and 1.54 (Stockholm). Dynamic thermal modelling assessed the economiser's efficacy in four distinct climatic zones.

Annual cooling electricity fell by 86% in Stockholm and 76% in San Francisco with the airside economiser. In Dubai and Singapore the economiser case used slightly more electricity than no economiser (+2% and +4%) because of higher mechanical fan energy and extra cooling demand. In Dubai most ambient temperatures lie between 17 °C and 38 °C, so a 24 °C economiser threshold is ineffective much of the time, and daily swings of about 20 °C would cycle the dampers, which calls for adaptive control.

The reviewed literature suggested 15-30% savings for moderate climates with free cooling below 24 °C, well below this model's 76-86%. ASHRAE TC 9.9 guidance suggests that, with proper design and extended temperature and humidity operating zones for IT equipment, outside air could potentially fulfil 100% of cooling needs throughout the year in most climates except humid and tropical zones. The choice of economiser control strategy, such as differential dry-bulb versus enthalpy control, can influence savings.

Limits: a single 90 kW modular design and four cities; results rest on this model's calibration (two OCP PUE values). In hot, humid climates the economiser gives no benefit and can even raise energy slightly.

Key points

  1. The base case is a 90 kW modular data centre; the model was calibrated using OCP PUE values of 1.5 (Dubai) and 1.54 (Stockholm).
  2. Annual cooling electricity fell by 86% in Stockholm and 76% in San Francisco with the airside economiser.
  3. In Dubai and Singapore the economiser case used slightly more electricity than no economiser (+2% and +4%) because of higher mechanical fan energy and extra cooling demand.
  4. In Dubai most ambient temperatures lie between 17 °C and 38 °C, so a 24 °C threshold is ineffective much of the time; daily swings of about 20 °C would cycle the dampers, calling for adaptive control.
  5. The reviewed literature suggested 15-30% savings for moderate climates with free cooling below 24 °C, well below this model's 76-86%.

Using it in design

  • Treat an airside economiser as a strong option in moderate climates (Stockholm 86%, San Francisco 76%); in Dubai and Singapore energy can rise (+2% and +4%).
  • In climates with large daily swings (about 20 °C in Dubai) define adaptive control that limits damper cycling, and verify the choice between dry-bulb and enthalpy control.
  • Check the economiser threshold (24 °C) against the ambient temperature distribution; do not expect benefit in climates where the distribution mostly sits above the threshold.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Check cooling capacity alongside your design

Review zone heat loads, available capacity and the capacity balance after the largest unit is lost in SoSo CAD.

Request a demo
Zone heat loads and capacity balance in the SoSo CAD cooling workspace

Who should read it

Designers assessing airside economiser suitability for modular and containerised data centres in different climates.

Document contents

  1. 1. Introduction (1.1 Background, 1.2 Data Centres: Past, Present, and Future)
  2. 2. Methodology (2.1 Layout and Construction Materials, 2.2 Modelled, 2.3 Modelled Heat Loads and HVAC System, 2.4 Model Validation)
  3. 3. Simulation Results and Analysis (3.2 Simulation Results for Each Location: Singapore, San Francisco, Stockholm, Dubai; 3.3 Analysis of Simulation Results Exploring Energy Saving Potentials for Each Location)
  4. 4. Discussion
  5. 5. Conclusions

Related standards

  • ASHRAE TC9.9 Thermal Guidelines

Read the document

airside-economiser-modular-dc-risks-2023.pdf

PDF · 4.5 MB · English

CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution

The document is provided unaltered because its licence permits redistribution.

Publication details

Authors
Ali Badiei; Eric Jadowski; Saba Sadati; Arash Beizaee; Jing Li; Leila Khajenoori; Hamid Reza Nasriani; Guiqiang Li; Xin Xiao
Publisher
Sustainability (MDPI AG)
Year
2023
Volume
15
Issue
14
Pages
10777
Document language
English
Source type
Scientific
Access
Open licence — downloadable
Licence
CC BY 4.0 — share with attribution
Licence evidence
www.mdpi.com
Original licence note

p.1 states the article is open access under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence.

Citation

Ali Badiei; Eric Jadowski; Saba Sadati; Arash Beizaee; Jing Li; Leila Khajenoori; Hamid Reza Nasriani; Guiqiang Li; Xin Xiao (2023). The Energy-Saving Potential of Air-Side Economisers in Modular Data Centres: Analysis of Opportunities and Risks in Different Climates. Sustainability (MDPI AG). 15(14), 10777. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151410777

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.