Accounting and Tax Benefits of Modular, Portable Data Center Infrastructure
Schneider Electric · Barry Rimler
Schneider Electric WP 115 (Barry Rimler, 2011) looks at the accounting and property-tax side of choosing factory-built modular power infrastructure over field-wired systems, from a US viewpoint. It is not tax advice.
On this page
Overview
The core argument: field-built UPS and PDU systems are usually booked as building or leasehold improvements. Building assets may carry a depreciable life upwards of 30+ years, while DCPI such as UPS and PDUs has a much shorter useful life. That inflates taxable real property and forces write-downs when equipment retires early. Example: a legacy UPS depreciated over 30 years and scrapped after 15 years faces a write-down of 50% of its original value.
Factory-built, cord-connected systems can often be treated as business equipment (personal property) with shorter lives, may avoid permit and inspection fees, and can sit on the computer-room floor without a dedicated UPS room. Inspection fees are usually 2%-3% of the value of the field-constructed portion of a contractor's contract. Avoiding a separate UPS room saves construction cost of roughly $18 to $35 per square foot in office buildings and well beyond $75 per square foot in medium and large standalone data centres. Base rents can range between $19 and $50 per square foot plus taxes, utilities and common areas, so a separate UPS room with aisles is disproportionately expensive except in larger installations.
A seven-step asset-management process ends in cost segregation: 5, 7, 10, 15 and 20 year property is separated from 30 or 39 year property to qualify for accelerated depreciation, and assets must pass the function-and-use and inherent-permanency tests. Tax and tax-related savings can exceed 20% of installed cost for a properly sized and booked factory-built UPS and PDU solution.
Key points
- Building assets may depreciate over 30+ years; DCPI such as UPS and PDUs has a much shorter useful life.
- A UPS depreciated over 30 years and scrapped at 15 faces a write-down of 50% of original value.
- Inspection fees are usually 2%-3% of the field-constructed portion of the contract.
- Avoiding a UPS room saves about $18-35/ft2 in offices and well over $75/ft2 in standalone data centres.
- Base rents of $19-50/ft2 plus taxes, utilities and common areas.
- Cost segregation separates 5/7/10/15/20 year property from 30 or 39 year property.
- Savings can exceed 20% of installed cost for a properly sized and booked factory-built solution.
Using it in design
- Add UPS placement (dedicated_ups_room, white_space) to the TCO module and charge room construction ($/ft2 or $/m2, editable by building type) plus occupancy cost for a dedicated room.
- Add an asset class (building_improvement vs business_equipment) and depreciation life per item so stranded-asset write-down can be estimated when refresh cycles are shorter than depreciation life.
- Apply a permit/inspection fee percentage only to field-built scope.
- Label all tax outputs as indicative and jurisdiction-specific.
Monthly newsletter · free
Keep your reading list current
Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.
SoSo CAD
Review your power design in SoSo CAD
Inspect supply paths, equipment loads and UPS failure scenarios in one model.
Request a demo
Who should read it
Designers, finance and corporate real-estate teams assessing infrastructure investment in TCO and asset-class terms.
Publication details
- Authors
- Barry Rimler
- Publisher
- Schneider Electric
- Year
- 2011
- Document number
- WP 115
- Document language
- English
- Source type
- Manufacturer
- Access
- Free to read
- Licence
- Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document
Citation
Barry Rimler (2011). Accounting and Tax Benefits of Modular, Portable Data Center Infrastructure. Schneider Electric. WP 115. https://download.schneider-electric.com/files?p_Doc_Ref=SPD_BRIR-5Z5T7P_EN
Events on this subject
Browse the events calendarAll content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.