Technical guideFree to read2016

Uptime Institute 2016 Data Center Industry Survey (6th annual) - press release

Uptime Institute

The press release for Uptime Institute's sixth annual survey, summarising the shift of enterprise workloads to cloud and colocation and the risks of colocation contracts.

On this page

Overview

This document is the press release announcing the results of Uptime Institute's sixth annual data center industry survey. Its focus is the move of enterprise workloads out of owned facilities into cloud and colocation, together with how satisfied customers are with colocation contracts and what risks those contracts carry. It is a short public summary of industry trends rather than a technical design guide.

The survey was run by email in February 2016 and reached over 1,000 data center operators and IT practitioners. The release reports that enterprise IT budgets are stagnating and that 55% of enterprise-managed server footprints are flat or shrinking. Among senior enterprise IT executives, 50% expect most IT workloads to reside off-premise, in cloud or colocation, in the future.

The most notable finding is that outsourcing does not remove risk. Nearly one third of enterprise respondents had experienced an outage at a colocation vendor's site. More than 60% said their SLA penalty clause would not adequately offset the cost of an outage to the business. In other words, contractual compensation is not proportional to the real business loss.

The limits are plain. This is a press release, with no raw data or methodology appendix, the respondent pool may not represent the whole industry, and the figures date from 2016. Even so, as an early baseline for a long-running survey series, it is useful for showing how outage risk should be framed in colocation and tenant scenarios.

Key points

  1. Survey conducted by email in February 2016 with over 1,000 data center operators and IT practitioners.
  2. 50% of senior enterprise IT executives expect most IT workloads to sit off-premise in cloud or colocation.
  3. Nearly one third of enterprise respondents had an outage at a colocation vendor site.
  4. Over 60% said the SLA penalty clause would not offset the business cost of an outage.
  5. 55% of enterprise-managed server footprints are flat or shrinking.
  6. Enterprise IT budgets are stagnant; the survey focused on the cloud/colocation shift and contract satisfaction.

Using it in design

  • In colocation or tenant scenarios, state explicitly that SLA credits rarely cover outage cost.
  • In the risk and cost module, value downtime separately from contractual penalties.
  • Do not present outsourcing as a risk-free option; include the probability of an outage at the provider site in scenarios.
  • Use this document as a baseline reference for tracking change across the long-running survey series.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Assess redundancy through scenarios

Compare normal operation and equipment failures in SoSo CAD, with supplied loads and capacity shortfalls in one view.

Request a demo
Normal operation and failure scenario comparison in SoSo CAD

Who should read it

Decision makers choosing colocation, tenant-side IT managers and design engineers who model outage risk.

Publication details

Authors
Uptime Institute
Publisher
Uptime Institute
Year
2016
Document language
English
Source type
Industry body
Access
Free to read
Licence
Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document
Original licence note

Publisher press release / public web page; copyright Uptime Institute, no open licence. Citation only.

Citation

Uptime Institute (2016). Uptime Institute 2016 Data Center Industry Survey (6th annual) - press release. Uptime Institute. https://uptimeinstitute.com/about-ui/press-releases/2016-survey-results

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.