Technical guideFree to read2021

Does the data centre industry need a new performance metric?

Cundall · Malcolm Howe

Cundall consultant Malcolm Howe explains why PUE is useful for trending one site but unreliable for comparing facilities, and how ITUE and TUE fill that gap.

On this page

Overview

The article was written in 2021 by Malcolm Howe, a critical-systems consultant at Cundall. It argues that PUE is useful for tracking the trend of one site over time but unreliable for comparing facilities, especially air versus liquid cooling. PUE is total facility power divided by IT power; the ideal is 1.0, and it is best used for trend tracking at one site rather than benchmarking. The author describes ITUE, which captures rack-level losses including fans, power supply units (PSUs) and voltage regulators.

ITUE was proposed by Intel's Michael Patterson and the EE HPC Working Group. TUE is ITUE multiplied by PUE. In a conventional 7 kW air-cooled rack, up to 10% of IT power can go to server and PSU fans; that share counts as IT load in PUE, so the PUE advantage of liquid cooling can be misleading. The recommendations are to meter energy at server level and to move fan power to the facility (cooling) side of the calculation.

The article ties the argument to liquid cooling and to warm-water (ASHRAE W5) operation that can remove chillers: facility water above 45 C can reduce or eliminate chillers. The article is a consultancy blog post and not a standard definition. The official PUE definition is in ISO/IEC 30134-2, while ITUE and TUE are proposed metrics. The numeric values are limited to the examples given in the article and cannot be generalised to every facility.

Key points

  1. PUE = total facility power / IT power; ideal 1.0; best for trend tracking at one site, not benchmarking.
  2. In a conventional 7 kW air-cooled rack, up to 10% of IT power can go to server and PSU fans.
  3. ITUE (proposed by Intel's Michael Patterson and the EE HPC Working Group) covers fans, PSUs and voltage regulators inside the rack.
  4. TUE = ITUE x PUE.
  5. Facility water above 45 C (ASHRAE W5) can reduce or eliminate chillers.
  6. Server-level metering and treating fan power as facility (cooling) energy are recommended.
  7. PUE values of air- and liquid-cooled facilities are not directly comparable.

Using it in design

  • Allow server fan power to be entered as a fraction of IT load and compute TUE alongside PUE.
  • Add a note that liquid-cooling PUE is not directly comparable to air-cooling PUE.
  • Add a metering point option at server level in the monitoring design.
  • Model the case where warm facility water (W5) reduces or removes chillers as a separate design option.
  • State the method and limits clearly in PUE reports.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Compare the cost of design decisions

Evaluate equipment costs, energy expenses and total cost of ownership (TCO) using your inputs and assumptions in SoSo CAD.

Request a demo
CAPEX and TCO estimates in the SoSo CAD cost workspace

Who should read it

Energy and cooling engineers who interpret PUE results or compare air- and liquid-cooled designs.

Related standards

  • ISO/IEC 30134-2 (PUE)

Publication details

Authors
Malcolm Howe
Publisher
Cundall
Year
2021
Document language
English
Source type
Expert / community
Access
Free to read
Licence
Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document

Citation

Malcolm Howe (2021). Does the data centre industry need a new performance metric?. Cundall. https://www.cundall.com/ideas/blog/does-the-data-centre-industry-need-a-new-performance-metric

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.