Technical guideFree to read2015

Diesel Generators in the Data Center - When is the Bigger the Better?

Cummins · David Matuseski

Cummins Power Topic #6064 (David Matuseski, 2015) argues for pairing the largest practical generator sets with a paralleling architecture in data centres, backing the case with footprint, maintenance-cost and failure-probability figures.

On this page

Overview

The paper makes two linked claims. Larger sets cut footprint, installation and maintenance cost, and paralleling reduces stranded capacity and makes N+1 or N+2 redundancy easy. For a 10 MW outdoor plant, 3.5 MW sets need two fewer generators and about 1,500 ft2 (140 m2) less land than 2.0 MW sets.

Annual maintenance for 10 MW in Table 1 is $47,614 for 7 x 1500 kW, $43,940 for 5 x 2000 kW and $31,854 for 3 x 3500 kW. The author also cites an independent risk study of a 12 MW N+1 plant in which fewer, larger sets show a lower system failure probability, because the most probable failures involve auxiliary equipment rather than engines or alternators.

Three concurrently maintainable paralleling topologies are described. A segmented bus with tie breakers can isolate one gear section in an N+2 plant while keeping N, and bus-differential relaying removes the bus as a single point of failure. A dual bus gives each generator its own transfer arrangement. The 'three to make two' scheme parallels load buses A and B so any one generator or switchgear item can be maintained with N still available.

Key points

  1. At 10 MW outdoor, 3.5 MW sets save two generators and about 140 m2 versus 2.0 MW sets.
  2. Annual maintenance at 10 MW: $47,614 (7 x 1500 kW), $43,940 (5 x 2000 kW), $31,854 (3 x 3500 kW).
  3. An independent 12 MW N+1 risk study shows lower failure probability with fewer, larger sets.
  4. Most probable failures are in auxiliaries, not engines or alternators.
  5. Listed paralleling benefits: efficiency, reliability, redundancy, transient performance, scalability, serviceability.
  6. Segmented bus with tie breakers isolates a gear section in N+2 while keeping N.
  7. 'Three to make two' (N+1) parallels load buses A/B so any single generator or gear item can be serviced with N available.

Using it in design

  • Compare candidate set sizes on count, footprint, install and maintenance cost for the target N+x, preferring fewer larger sets where the site allows.
  • For segmented bus, dual bus and three-to-make-two templates, verify that removing any one generator or gear section leaves at least N.
  • Direct reliability effort at auxiliaries such as fuel, cooling and controls, since those dominate the failure modes cited.

Monthly newsletter · free

Keep your reading list current

Once a month: new library sources, changes to Turkish regulations and upcoming data centre events.

SoSo CAD

Review your power design in SoSo CAD

Inspect supply paths, equipment loads and UPS failure scenarios in one model.

Request a demo
Single-line diagram in the SoSo CAD power and capacity workspace

Who should read it

Electrical designers and decision makers sizing and choosing the topology of a data-centre standby generator plant.

Related standards

  • Uptime Institute Tier Standard: Topology

Publication details

Authors
David Matuseski
Publisher
Cummins
Year
2015
Document number
Power Topic #6064
Document language
English
Source type
Manufacturer
Access
Free to read
Licence
Copyright retained; citation only — the publisher’s terms apply to the original document

Citation

David Matuseski (2015). Diesel Generators in the Data Center - When is the Bigger the Better?. Cummins. Power Topic #6064. https://mart.cummins.com/imagelibrary/data/assetfiles/0056714.pdf

All content and rights belong to the respective authors and publishers. SoSo CAD provides only the citation, its own summary and a link to the source, and is not responsible for the sources' content.